Constitutional Development And National Movement in Subcontinent

A.45
B.50
C.55
D.60
E.65

A.1804
B.1905
C.1906
D.1907
E.1908

A.Lord Curzon followed stiff necked policies
B.In 1905 partition of Bengal was decided
C.Japan was defeated miserably by Russia
D.Indians abroad were being humiliated
E.The people of India were suffering from groaning poverty

A.Morley-Minto Reforms
B.Montague-Chelmsford Reforms
C.Act of Dyarchy
D.Act of Provincial Autonomy
E.None of these

A. Indians got an opportunity to enter Councils
B. That legislature should control executive
C. That the executive was supreme body over legislature
D. That members were allowed to put questions
E. Non-official members got an opportunity to discuss financial policies of the Government

A.Lord North Brooke
B.Lord Sinha
C.Charles Bradlaugh
D.None of these

A.Indian National Congress had been founded
B.Poverty of the people was on the increase
C.Enlightened educated class was demanding more rights
D.Government was favourably inclined to accept Congress demands

A.It made a beginning in the representative institution
B.It made beginning in legislative devolution
C.Government got opportunity to defend its policies
D.Non-official members were added to the Governor-General’s Council
E.It made legislatures really a representative body

A.Number of ordinary executive councillor was raised to five
B.Secretary of State was empowered to appoint C-in-C as extraordinary member of his council
C.Assent of Governor-General was necessary for all bills
D.Governor-General could not revoke a measure passed by Governor’s Council
E.Legislative powers of Bombay Presidency were restored

A.The Act of 1858 had been passed in haste
B.Centralised system of legislation was inadequate
C.Provincial Governments were not tolerating Bengal domination
D.There was demand in India that Indians should be associated with administration
E.Provinces wanted complete customary from Bengal Council